launch · slot 461,545,239 · 2026-10-26 05:27 UTC
Looking for Group LFG
3jGGFX12LGaJQi8ChHxyVukHp22dYgrTvEWj4PoZpump
No buys in slot 0 besides the creator's 0.9%.
Linked + cluster
Linked to the creator0%0 wallets
Cluster (same funder)0%0 wallets
Dev initial buy
the creator's own buy in slot 0
Unlinked
1 slot-0 buyers · 0 failed · 1 early-slot
Slot 0
Shares are of total supply (1.00B tokens). Slot 0 is the slot of the create transaction; slots +1 and +2 are the early slots.
Slot 0
| # | wallet | class | bought | link and proof | first hour | transaction |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 46 | 38v5…XU2Y dev record | creator | 0.9% 8.76M · 0.247 SOL | Dev initial buy inside the create transaction (a normal pump.fun feature)Busy wallet: funding read back to 2026-10-26 02:47 UTC (100 transactions). | sold 100.0% | 5KUb…q9nf no tip · 134,963 µL/CU |
Early slots (+1, +2)
Wallets whose first buy came in the two slots after the create. Their own funding history is not read; the creator-side checks (rules a and b) and rule c still apply.
First hour outcome
- creator sold
- 100.0%
- linked wallets sold
- no linked wallets
- top 10 token accounts
- 0% bonding curve excluded
- market cap at +1 h
- $2,814
Read at 2026-10-26 06:31 UTC. Sold and moved are shares of what each wallet bought in slots 0 to +2.
After 24 hours
Checked 24 hours after launch.
Rule c (tokens sent to the creator or a linked wallet) checked to 2026-10-26 06:27 UTC; final at +24 h.
The dev
38v5H7ZVheweTJNtZR3Un1EmU62BdZyBki9woiC6XU2Y
1 launch · 1 clean · 0 with linked slot-0 buys · avg 0% linked
Share and embed
Something wrong in this record? Dispute this record. Every label links to the transactions behind it; how it is computed.