launch · slot 461,727,940 · 2026-10-26 16:14 UTC

Rotoscope ROTO

2jHX8jTcqVue8Y6Z84oLDhxLernkVmifCVfrEWJupump

checking fundingPartial record: CLEAN and DEV-HEAVY need every check to finish.

2 unlinked wallets bought 3.1% of supply in slot 0.

Being checked. The blocks are read; the funding histories of the creator and the slot-0 buyers are queued and read in priority order (launches with 2 or more slot-0 buyers first). Until then no buyer is called linked or unlinked. This page refreshes.

Linked + cluster

0%

Linked to the creator0%0 wallets

Cluster (same funder)0%0 wallets

Dev initial buy

25.3%

the creator's own buy in slot 0

Unlinked

3.1%

3 slot-0 buyers · 3 failed · 0 early-slot

Slot 0

slot 461,727,940 · block order →creatorlinkedclusterunlinkedfailed

Shares are of total supply (1.00B tokens). Slot 0 is the slot of the create transaction; slots +1 and +2 are the early slots.

Slot 0

#walletclassboughtlink and prooffirst hourtransaction
348 5RCd…Hmzd dev record creator 25.3% 253.10M · 9.26 SOL Dev initial buy inside the create transaction (a normal pump.fun feature) read at +1 h 2q6H…REhv
no tip · 160,000 µL/CU
349 An7r…etAn unlinked 2.7% 26.93M · 1.33 SOL No link to the creator found. read at +1 h 5v2z…5quh
no tip
639 8fN6…EPXs unlinked 0.4% 3.84M · 0.198 SOL No link to the creator found. read at +1 h 2Jdf…cNya
no tip · 23,622,047 µL/CU

Failed attempts in slot 0 3

#walleterrortransaction
6772nU1…W7vM{"InstructionError":[3,"IncorrectProgramId"]}4AgH…sZYq
691nigg…m5zS via 5kZm…CMoz{"InstructionError":[1,{"Custom":111}]}W5Gy…WfR1
7116fAV…YwQ8{"InstructionError":[3,"IncorrectProgramId"]}3Eue…tKYF

First hour outcome

Read one hour after launch (queued).

After 24 hours

Checked 24 hours after launch.

Rule c (tokens sent to the creator or a linked wallet) checked after the first hour; final at +24 h.

The dev

5RCd5gjghzEJkjfHj4DLwpbMsjFb7SMqWkdLwRdbHmzd

12 launches · 0 clean · 0 with linked slot-0 buys · avg 0% linked

Dev record →

Share and embed

Block Zero badge for this launch

Share card (1200×630) · JSON

Something wrong in this record? Dispute this record. Every label links to the transactions behind it; how it is computed.